Global networks and the push for COMPLETE CONTROL: Unpacking the power behind the COVID Plandemic, the Climate Change SCAM, and toxic food systems

A 2011 Swiss study revealed that just 147 corporations — primarily European — controlled 40% of the world’s wealth, with Barclays at the epicenter. This concentration of power extends beyond finance into global health, climate policy, and food supply chains, according to investigations by groups like Germany’s Club Der Klaren Worte. Their 2021 report mapped a tightly knit network of individuals and institutions — including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and key political figures — accused of orchestrating the COVID-19 response, climate agendas, and food monopolies. As debates over “The Great Reset” intensify, critics argue these networks aim to reshape global governance through technocratic control.

1. Concentration of Corporate and Financial Power
   • A 2011 Swiss study revealed that 147 corporations, primarily in Europe, controlled 40% of global wealth, with Barclays Bank at the center.
   • A small, interconnected core of financial institutions dominates economic and policy decisions worldwide.
2. COVID-19 Network: Orchestrated by Elite Actors
   • A 170-page German investigation exposed a tightly-knit group of 20–30 individuals directing the pandemic response, including:
     • Angela Merkel, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (WHO), Bill Gates (BMGF), and Klaus Schwab (WEF).
   • Key organizations: WHO, GAVI, Wellcome Trust, Rockefeller Foundation, Big Pharma, and WEF — all heavily funded by Gates.
   • The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation sits at the center, influencing global health, media, and policy.
3. Climate Agenda: Central Banks & Financialization of Nature
   • Mark Carney (ex-Bank of England, UN Climate Envoy) and Michael Bloomberg spearheaded the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
   • Green Finance Institute (GFI) and Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) push banks to enforce “net-zero” policies, backed by BlackRock’s Larry Fink and WEF.
   • King Charles III’s Terra Carta and Sustainable Markets Initiative (SMI) aim to financialize nature, demanding $5 trillion/year for climate policies.
4. Food Control & The Great Reset
   • The Rockefeller Foundation, Gates Foundation, and WEF are central to monopolizing agriculture via GMO patents, synthetic foods, and “sustainable” farming mandates.
   • WEF’s “Great Reset” seeks to overhaul food production, promoting lab-grown meat and insect-based diets under the guise of climate action.
   • Corporate consolidation (e.g., Bayer-Monsanto) ensures elite control over global food supply chains.

The COVID-19 Network: A Web of Influence

The Club Der Klaren Worte’s 170-page dossier identified over 7,200 connections among 6,500 entities, centering on figures like Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (WHO), Angela Merkel, and Bill Gates-linked organizations such as GAVI and the Wellcome Trust. The report alleges these actors drove pandemic policies while sidelining dissent. “The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation appears near the top of the COVID plandemic network,” the anonymous author wrote, noting its ties to media funding and the WEF’s “Great Reset” agenda. Institutions like the WHO and Johns Hopkins University were key nodes in this alleged network.

Mark Carney, former Bank of England governor and UN climate envoy, exemplifies the intersection of finance and climate policy. In 2015, he co-launched the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) with Michael Bloomberg, later expanding into initiatives like the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ). Critics, such as analyst Dan Fournier, argue these efforts prioritize elite interests: “Carney’s ties to global banking elites should leave little doubt as to the dire economic plight” of nations complying with such agendas. GFANZ, backed by BlackRock’s Larry Fink and Prince Charles’ Sustainable Markets Initiative, now oversees $47 trillion in assets, accelerating what some call a “financialization of nature.”

The Food and “Great Reset” Nexus

The Rockefeller and Gates foundations, alongside the WEF, have long influenced global food systems through initiatives like GAVI and agro-industrial partnerships. Critics warn these efforts consolidate control over supply chains under the guise of sustainability. In 2020, Prince Charles and the WEF unveiled “The Great Reset,” framed as a post-pandemic economic overhaul but decried by skeptics as a push for centralized authority. Charles’ Terra Carta, a 2020 manifesto, called for embedding “nature’s rights” into economics—a vision some equate to technocratic overreach.

From pandemic responses to climate finance, a recurring cast of institutions and individuals—Barclays, Gates, Carney, the WEF—appear to wield disproportionate influence over global systems. While proponents argue these networks drive necessary reforms, detractors see a dangerous consolidation of power. As the “Great Reset” debate rages, the tension between collective action and individual autonomy remains a defining challenge of the 21st century.

Check out ClimateAlarmism.news for updates on psychotic billionaires spending big chunks of their money to adulterate the meat and dairy food supply while decreasing the population by a few billion using vaccines and Ponzi schemes.

Sources for this article include:

NaturalNews.com

BezoEarthFund.org

Expose-news.com